People v. Wittrein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a party may not complain of an error that they have invited or injected into the case; they must abide the consequences of their acts
• noting that under the invited error doctrine, a party may not complain on appeal of an error that the party invited or injected into the case and that the party must abide the consequences of his or her acts
• noting that under the invited error doctrine, a party may not complain on appeal of an error that the party invited or injected into the case and that the party must abide the consequences of his or her acts
• deeming inadmissible a social worker’s testimony that, in her opinion, children the victim’s age were not capable of fabricating 13 allegations of sexual abuse
• discussing factors that a court must balance to determine whether the need for disclosure outweighs a student’s and her parents’ privacy interests
• developing a balancing test to weigh a defendant's need to discover information with the privacy rights of the non-party possessor of that information and applying the test to the case before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named People v. Wittrein

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Wittrein
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-05-01· cited 3×