Van EE v. Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that therapy notes made by psychiatrist, which were not discussed by the ALJ, did not appreciably support claimant’s claim
• concluding that therapy notes made by psychiatrist, which were not discussed by the ALJ, -31- did not appreciably support claimant’s claim
• addressing allegation that agency’s no-jeopardy 12 conclusion concerning mackerel fishery in biological opinion was arbitrary and 13 capricious
• “cautionary language spread out among various documents is insufficient to protect misleading oral statements under the ‘bespeaks caution’ doctrine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).