Skip to main content
· 5/13/1991

United States v. Eugene Donald Schaltenbrand

Citations

  • 930 F.2d 1554
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9299
  • 1991 WL 63745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The party invoking the attorney-client privilege has the burden of proving that an attorney-client relationship existed and that the particular communications were confidential.”
  • applying rule for attorney-client issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Kravitch, Tjoflat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.