Refine Construction Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e read the Court’s opinion to permit a future challenge to the Pennsylvania Act in another case after the Act goes into effect.”
• “At a minimum, we believe the Court meant that other state abortion laws require individualized application of the undue burden standard.”
• “A person's domicile is her permanent home, where 15 she resides with the intention to remain or to which she intends to return”
• “The confusion must be probable, not simply a possibility.” 15 (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).