Skip to main content
· 6/15/1970

United States v. Sweig

Citations

  • 316 F. Supp. 1148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The fact that preparations, even essential ones, [by an accessory] may take place ‘elsewhere,’ and that effects may radiate widely, does not render a discrete and identifiable wrong ‘continuing’ so as to give the prosecution a choice of two or more districts in which to prosecute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frankel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.