Valentine v. Van Sickle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that there was no evidence to support the conclusion that the Husband’s income, which had been artificially inflated by temporary economic conditions during the first part of 2008, would continue at that level in the future

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).