Haas v. Haas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• regarding the need to make findings in support of equitable distribution orders
• reversing alimony because it appeared “that the trial court may have imputed income based upon a party’s prior extraordinary efforts rather than upon the best efforts which reasonably should be expected over an extended time”
• remanding for reconsideration of alimony because “we are concerned that the trial court may have imputed income based upon a party’s prior extraordinary efforts rather than upon the best efforts which reasonably should be expected over an extended time period”
• reasonable availability of health insurance unclear; remanded for determination
• findings may be necessary to permit meaningful appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Polizzi v. Polizzi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-29· cited 30×
• Valentine v. Van Sickle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-28· cited 21×
• In Re Guardianship of Sitter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-16· cited 18×
• Geoghegan v. Geoghegan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-16· cited 13×
• Hillman v. Hillman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-12· cited 10×
• Braman v. Braman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-17· cited 6×
• Green v. Green
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-13· cited 6×
• Kim v. Bradshaw
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-15· cited 5×
• Gibson v. Gibson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-10· cited 3×
• Walters v. Walters
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-25· cited 3×
• Regante v. Belsky
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-22· cited 2×
• Mannix v. Mannix
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-29· cited 2×
• Beard v. Beard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-22· cited 1×
• O'Leesky v. Liggett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-12· cited 1×
• Lawlor v. Lawlor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-10· cited 1×
• Abbott v. Abbott
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-27· cited 1×
• Moorman v. Moorman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-18
• Burston v. Burston
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-02

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-05-02· cited 889×
• Waldman v. Waldman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-16· cited 39×
• Desilets v. Desilets
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-11-30· cited 33×
• Sokol v. Sokol
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-26· cited 24×
• Barrs v. Barrs
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-10· cited 23×
• Thornton v. Thornton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-30· cited 21×
• Miceli v. Miceli
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-03· cited 15×
• Perlmutter v. Perlmutter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-03-25· cited 14×
• Clemson v. Clemson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-30· cited 14×
• Maas v. Maas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-07· cited 11×
• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-09-24· cited 9×
• Strickler v. Strickler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-24· cited 8×
• Woodruff & Sons, Inc. v. Pary, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-26· cited 5×
• Wolfman v. Wolfman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-03-25· cited 4×
• Metz v. Metz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-28· cited 2×