S&E Contractors, Inc. v. City of Tampa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing award of dissipated asset when no evidence contradicted the wife's testimony that she expended the funds in her IRA for support during the dissolution proceedings
• rejecting husband’s claim that he was automatically entitled to full credit for mortgage payments he made during the separation
• reversing award of dissipated asset when no evidence contradicted the wife’s testimony that she expended the funds in her IRA for support during the dissolution proceedings
• reversing credit to husband for mortgage payments made during the period between separation and dissolution because “the marital assets were acquired largely on the strength of the husband’s income, which provided the cash flow to meet the mortgage payments and expenses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).