District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/26/2009

Austin v. Austin

Citations

12 So. 3d 314
2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8514
2009 WL 1811811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that trial court is required to identify marital liabilities in final judgment and designate which spouse is responsible for each liability
noting that additional evidence was warranted on remand due, in part, to original testimony of future events that may or may not have occurred
noting that additional evidence was warranted on remand due, in part, to original testimony of future events that may or may not have occurred
stating that “the trial court cannot award assets that were depleted during the dissolution proceedings that were expended for support and marital expenses if the parties engaged in no misconduct”
requiring trial court on remand to reconsider the issue of attorney’s fees based on the appellate court’s reversal of the equitable distribution scheme
“With respect to equitable distribution, the trial court is required to identify and value the significant marital assets and designate which spouse is entitled to each asset-”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman, Casanueva, Larose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.