Vaccone v. Syken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order disqualifying counsel in a civil case is an interlocutory order, which is not immediately appealable
• finding “orders disqualifying counsel in civil cases are not collateral orders subject to appeal”
• noting the similarities between our collateral order jurisprudence and the high Court's
• noting the similarities between our collateral order jurisprudence and the high Court’s
• circumstances of disqualification of petitioner’s counsel not extreme, or unusual, or of such public importance, that general rule regarding sparing use of extraordinary jurisdiction would not apply
• “[W]e believe that it has become necessary to remember the purpose of the finality rule, which is to avoid piecemeal litigation, and not to become swallowed up in its exceptions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).