Carbis Walker, LLP v. Hill, Barth and King, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that party asserting privilege must initially set forth facts showing that the privilege has been properly invoked
• explaining that party asserting privilege must initially set forth facts showing that the privilege has been properly invoked
• “Courts in this Commonwealth have recognized that ‘the roots of the attorney-client privilege are firmly entrenched in our common law .... ’ ”
• \[T]he party who has asserted the attorney-client privilege must initially set forth facts showing that the privilege has been properly invoked. . . .\
• \Courts in this Commonwealth have recognized that `the roots of the attorney-client privilege are firmly entrenched in our common law. . . .'\
• “[W]hile the attorney-client privilege belongs to the client, the attorney, acting as the client’s agent, may be sufficiently negligent in producing the privilege that it may be waived .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).