Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Scarborough

Citations

  • 64 A.3d 602
  • 619 Pa. 353
  • 2013 WL 1173989
  • 2013 Pa. LEXIS 505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing the distinction between a motion for DNA testing and a PCRA petition and holding that the denial of a motion under § 9543.1 was not an interlocutory order within a PCRA proceeding, but a final, appealable order under Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)
  • “As a general rule . . . appellate courts only have jurisdiction over appeals taken from a final order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Melvin, Saylor, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.