In re Reglan Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding issue was not sufficiently separate from the main cause of action where it did not involve “the application of clearly established law to a given set of facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dougherty v. Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-11· cited 23×
• Collier, J. v. National Penn Bank
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-11-24· cited 17×
• Geronimo, J. v. Commonwealth Environmental Systems
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-03-23

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 2,857×
• PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 428×
• Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. Architectural Studio
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-19· cited 251×
• Hess v. Fox Rothschild, LLP
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-14· cited 136×
• Cardenas v. Schober
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-30· cited 83×
• Pridgen v. Parker Hannifin Corp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-22· cited 79×
• Weiley v. Albert Einstein Medical Center
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-24· cited 67×
• Cooper v. Frankford Health Care System, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-10-20· cited 63×
• Brosovic v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-01-20· cited 59×
• Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-11-27· cited 56×
• Vaccone v. Syken
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-06-19· cited 51×
• Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-01-08· cited 37×
• In re Estate of Sauers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-23· cited 35×