Vacco v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying traditional common-law principles of proximate causation to determine standing to bring CUTPA action
• “notwithstanding the broad language and remedial purpose of CUTPA, we have applied traditional common-law principles of remoteness and proximate causation to determine whether a party has standing to bring an action under CUTPA”
• “notwithstanding the broad language and remedial purpose of CUTPA, we have applied traditional common-law principles of remoteness and proximate causation to determine whether a party has standing to bring an action under CUTPA”
• \[t]he legislature amended the [act] in 1992 to make explicit its intent that the judiciary shall interpret the [act] in accordance with the federal courts' interpretation of federal antitrust law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2011-12-20· cited 369×
• Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2005-08-25· cited 244×
• Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-10-05· cited 194×
• Macomber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-09-03· cited 131×
• Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. Alves
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-04· cited 110×
• Craig v. Driscoll
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-02-04· cited 98×
• In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation
  D. Maine· 2004-12-08· cited 62×
• In re Niaspan Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-09-05· cited 62×
• Comes v. Microsoft Corp.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2002-06-12· cited 60×
• Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-03-19· cited 58×
• Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Department of Education
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-17· cited 55×
• Bunker's Glass Co. v. PILKINGTON, PLC
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-08-25· cited 40×
• A & M SUPPLY CO. v. Microsoft Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-11-13· cited 38×
• Siena v. Microsoft Corp.
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2002-05-09· cited 33×
• Miller's Pond Co., LLC v. City of New London
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-06-07· cited 29×
• In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative
  S.D. Texas· 2005-02-16· cited 26×
• State v. Marsh and McLennan Companies, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-15· cited 26×
• LaChance v. United States Smokeless Tobacco Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-08-24· cited 26×
• Connecticut Podiatric Medical Ass'n v. Health Net of Connecticut, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-10-18· cited 25×
• Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. Ganim
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-30· cited 23×

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters
  Supreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,116×
• Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-30· cited 1,640×
• Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,382×
• Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,277×
• Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 921×
• Blue Shield of Va. v. McCready
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 680×
• United States v. Microsoft Corp.
  D.C. Circuit· 2001-06-28· cited 502×
• Waters v. Autuori
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-07· cited 485×
• California v. ARC America Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-18· cited 472×
• Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-23· cited 312×
• Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-08· cited 274×
• Haesche v. Kissner
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-18· cited 259×
• State of New York v. Hendrickson Brothers, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1988-02-16· cited 232×
• Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 222×
• Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
  Supreme Court· 1978-02-27· cited 206×
• Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit District
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 149×
• Bohan v. Last
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-04-23· cited 114×
• Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-09· cited 111×
• Abrahams v. Young & Rubicam, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-08· cited 104×
• Laborers Local 17 Health & Benefit Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1999-04-09· cited 100×