Skip to main content
· 5/9/2002

Siena v. Microsoft Corp.

Citations

  • 796 A.2d 461
  • 2002 R.I. LEXIS 97
  • 2002 WL 971877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the state attorney general has standing as parens patriae to protect the rights of indirect purchasers in antitrust matters since they cannot bring such actions themselves directly
  • explaining that Rhode Island statute required construction in harmony with judicial interpretations of comparable federal antitrust statutes
  • explaining that Rhode Island statute required construction in harmony with judicial interpretations of comparable federal antitrust statutes
  • noting that the Rhode Island antitrust statute limited the right to bring damages action on behalf of indirect purchasers to the Attorney General as parens patriae
  • stating “the enormous number of potential litigants created by adopting such a warranty or end user license exception to Illinois Brick Co. is, in itself, instructive . . . [and] these incidental agreements do not exempt plaintiffs’ claims from the purview of Illinois Brick Co.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Lederberg, Bourcier, Flanders, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.