Skip to main content

Upton v. State

Citations

  • 894 S.W.2d 426
  • 1995 Tex. App. LEXIS 178
  • 1995 WL 40645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that inconsistencies or conflicts within the testimony do not automatically render the witness incompetent
  • stating that inconsistencies or conflicts within the testimony do not automatically render the witness incompetent
  • stating that inconsistencies or conflicts within the testimony do not automatically render the witness incompetent
  • holding the trial court did not err where the witness’s “testimony during the punishment phase of the trial neither corroborated nor contradicted evidence serving to establish or refute an element of the crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynolds, Dodson, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.