University & Cmty. Coll. Sys. v. Sutton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court did not abuse its discretion by denying amendment after the close of discovery, on a nontrivial matter, and when the movant knew of the facts underlying amendment nine months earlier
• pre-termination hearing findings did not preclude issues in later litigation involving different employment contract
• interpreting the federal counterpart to NRCP 15(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).