Skip to main content
· 1/23/2008

Brown v. Kinross Gold U.S.A., Inc.

Citations

  • 531 F. Supp. 2d 1234
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7769
  • 2008 WL 189683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that damages are an element of a breach of 20 contract claim
  • declining to grant summary judgment because a 14 dispute of material fact existed as to whether two entities were alter egos
  • “[T]he Nevada Supreme Court frequently looks to the Delaware Supreme Court and the Delaware Courts of Chancery as persuasive authorities on questions of corporation law . . . .”
  • listing the three elements of the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Philip M. Pro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.