Skip to main content
· 9/1/1998

Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance

Citations

  • 963 P.2d 465
  • 114 Nev. 823
  • 1998 Nev. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that collateral estoppel, or claim preclusion, includes the same elements as issue preclusion but embraces not only the grounds of recovery that were asserted in the prior suit but those that could have been asserted
  • requiring a false 25 communication for a foreclosure sale in a slander of title claim
  • \[A]pplying claim preclusion to subsequent litigation between former codefendants would have the effect of negating permissive cross-claim rules. . . .\
  • \[A]pplying claim preclusion to subsequent litigation between former codefendants would have the effect of negating permissive cross-claim rules. . . .\
  • \[A]pplying claim preclusion to subsequent litigation between former codefendants would have the effect of negating permissive cross-claim rules. . . .\
  • even if judge’s ex parte consultation of judge in prior case was error, it was harmless where judge could have independently come to decision to dismiss on basis of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.