Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion because, among other things, the motion was “motivated at least partly by tactical considerations”
• “[I]t is improper per se for an attorney to participate in a lawsuit against his or her own client in a situation in which the lawyer has traditional attorney-client relationships with both clients.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bowens v. Atlantic Maintenance Corp.
  E.D. New York· 2008-04-23· cited 62×
• In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2006-01-23· cited 42×
• Merck Eprova AG v. ProThera, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2009-09-17· cited 35×
• Shabbir v. Pakistan International Airlines
  E.D. New York· 2005-12-19· cited 20×
• Post-Confirmation Committee of Unsecured Creditors of I Successor Corp. v. Feld Group, Inc. (In Re I Successor Corp.)
  S.D. New York· 2005-03-10· cited 17×
• Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes
  S.D. New York· 2000-07-19· cited 15×
• First NBC Bank v. Murex, LLC
  S.D. New York· 2017-04-28· cited 15×
• Reilly v. Computer Associates Long-Tterm Disability Plan
  E.D. New York· 2006-03-30· cited 8×
• Reed v. Hoosier Health Systems, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-04-13· cited 6×
• PIERCE & WEISS, LLP. v. Subrogation Partners LLC
  E.D. New York· 2010-02-16· cited 6×
• Nunez v. Lovell
  Virgin Islands· 2008-10-03· cited 6×
• Frontline Communications International, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co.
  S.D. New York· 2002-11-21· cited 2×
• In re Hodge - (
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2017-12-29