Shabbir v. Pakistan International Airlines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a moving party “must demonstrate that the testimony of the attorney subject to disqualification is both necessary and substantially likely to be prejudicial.”
• “The more speculative the potential prejudice, the less likely a court will be to grant a motion to disqualify.”
• “[A] lawyer who could provide only cumulative testimony may act as trial counsel.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “The more speculative the potential prejudice, the less likely a court will be to grant a motion to disqualify.” (citing Donaghy, 858 F. Supp. at 398)
• “[A] lawyer who could provide only cumulative testimony may act as trial counsel.”
• “[A] lawyer who could provide only cumulative testimony may act as trial counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).