Merck Eprova AG v. ProThera, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that tactical motivations could not be inferred when an “entirely reasonable explanation” existed for the moving party’s delay
• holding that tactical motivations could not be inferred when an “entirely reasonable explanation” existed for the moving party’s delay
• distinguishing joint representation from joint interest theories and noting that ‘joint representation is frequently confused with the ‘common interest’ doctrine’
• law firm, which represented drug manufacturer in patent application on behalf of corporate inventor, also represented inventor, who had joint attorney-client relationship with manufacturer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).