Skip to main content
· 3/10/2005

Post-Confirmation Committee of Unsecured Creditors of I Successor Corp. v. Feld Group, Inc. (In Re I Successor Corp.)

Citations

  • 321 B.R. 640
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 396
  • 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 139
  • 2005 WL 627561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming that attorneys owe a duty of loyalty to former clients which is separate and distinct from the duty to preserve client confidences
  • rejecting the assertion that a lawyer has no duty of loyalty to a former client
  • rejecting the assertion that a lawyer has no duty of loyalty to a former client
  • criticizing district court’s decision that relied upon Weintraub for proposition that acquiring control of attorney-client privilege requires an effort to reconstitute or operate the pre-existing entity
  • criticizing district court's decision that relied upon Weintraub for proposition that acquiring control of attorney-client privilege requires an effort to reconstitute or operate the pre-existing entity
  • pertinent inquiry in Tekni-Plex was whether old corporation’s business operations were to be continued under new management or whether the old corporation ceased to exist

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.