United States v. Albert M. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• polygraph condition did not violate defendant’s Fifth Amendment right because it did not require him to answer incriminating questions
• “Since appellant is already directed to report periodically to the probation officer and provide truthful answers ... the additional requirement that Lee undergo polygraph testing does not place a significantly greater demand on him.”
• polygraphs may be imposed for treatment and deterrence purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).