Tenth Circuit· 7/5/2017

United States v. Williston

Citations

862 F.3d 1023
2017 WL 2856396
2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that Miller’s “age cutoff” between juveniles and adult offenders raises “some element of arbitrariness” but explaining that “[i]f the Miller ruling is to be expanded, it is the province of the Supreme Court to do so”
declining to expand the holding of Miller to offenders who are “ ‘just over age 18’ ” at the time of their offenses
stating that the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel attaches upon the start of adversarial proceedings, which is itself “triggered by a formal charging event, such as an . . . information”
declining to expand the holding of Miller to offenders who are \ 'just over age 18' \ at the time of their offenses
declining to expand the holding of Miller to offenders who are “ ‘just over age 18’ ” at the time of their offenses
addressing certain rights of grand jury witnesses, including “witnesses implicated in the criminal activities that the grand jury is investigating”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Matheson, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.