United States v. William J. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a conviction because the district court instructed the jury that they must find a specific question as a matter of law rather than leaving the question for the jury to determine
• if the trial judge chooses to comment on the evidence, he must instruct the jury that they are not bound by his comments
• if the trial judge chooses to comment on the evidence, he must instruct the jury that they are not bound by his comments
• \The scheme to defraud need not be successful to create a violation of the wire fraud statute.\
• trial judge summarized documents for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. William J. Johnson

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. William J. Johnson
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-08-25· cited 60×
• United States v. William J. Johnson
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-04-18· cited 21×
• United States v. William J. Johnson
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-04-23