Sixth Circuit· 5/1/2012
United States v. Cunningham
Citations
- 679 F.3d 355
- 2012 WL 1500180
- 88 Fed. R. Serv. 365
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8786
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(A) allows “a party’s own statement to be offered as evidence against that party even where the statement would otherwise be inadmissible as hearsay”
- lawyers diverted the opposing party's settlement payment to the lawyers' personal accounts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batchelder, Clay, Gilman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- King Bradley, Jr. v. Ameristep, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2015-08-24· cited 53×
- United States v. Ronda NixonSixth Circuit· 2012-09-11· cited 42×
- Harry Calcutt III v. FDICSixth Circuit· 2022-06-10· cited 38×
- United States v. Angelique BankstonSixth Circuit· 2016-04-14· cited 35×
- United States v. Jason BrownSixth Circuit· 2016-03-24· cited 34×
- McGirr v. RehmeSixth Circuit· 2018-05-31· cited 32×
- United States v. Richard OliveSixth Circuit· 2015-09-22· cited 27×
- John B. v. Mark EmkesSixth Circuit· 2013-03-14· cited 26×
- United States v. Michael E. SmithSixth Circuit· 2019-02-26· cited 24×
- Daniels v. Erie Ins. Grp.M.D. Tennessee· 2017-12-04· cited 22×
- United States v. Frank RichardsonSixth Circuit· 2015-07-13· cited 18×
- Kloss v. RBS Citizens, N.A.E.D. Michigan· 2014-02-06· cited 18×
- United States v. Michael JohnsonSixth Circuit· 2022-01-31· cited 16×
- United States v. Sean HowleySixth Circuit· 2013-02-04· cited 14×
- Deere & Co. v. FIMCO Inc.W.D. Kentucky· 2017-03-08· cited 14×
- United States v. Jyoti AgrawalSixth Circuit· 2024-04-01· cited 14×
- DayCab Company, Inc. v. Prairie Technology, LLCSixth Circuit· 2023-05-11· cited 9×
- Chappelle Gales v. Allenbrooke Nursing & Rehab. Ctr.Sixth Circuit· 2024-01-22· cited 6×
- Huffman v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 2015-09-17· cited 5×
- Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co. v. DavisS.D. Ohio· 2016-06-08· cited 5×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 2,553×
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 2,420×
- Jan M. Sexton Salmi v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesSixth Circuit· 1985-09-19· cited 664×
- In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationSixth Circuit· 2008-05-15· cited 510×
- United States v. WarshakSixth Circuit· 2010-12-14· cited 376×
- Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 2007-01-18· cited 333×
- United States v. Calvin Caver (05-3295) Tamir Abdullah (05-3297) Fred Cloud (05-3344)Sixth Circuit· 2006-12-04· cited 264×
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Lawrence Douglas Todd, Cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1990-12-04· cited 179×
- United States v. John Charles Richard MentzSixth Circuit· 1988-02-22· cited 170×
- David Hamblin v. Betty Mitchell, WardenSixth Circuit· 2003-12-29· cited 167×
- United States v. J. Richard JamiesonSixth Circuit· 2005-10-28· cited 166×
- United States v. MartinezSixth Circuit· 2009-12-01· cited 162×
- United States v. Larry T. TarwaterSixth Circuit· 2002-10-16· cited 147×
- United States v. HendersonSixth Circuit· 2010-11-19· cited 138×
- United States v. Ralph M. Daniel, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 2003-05-22· cited 130×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.