· 5/29/1933
Quercia v. United States
Citations
- 289 U.S. 466
- 53 S. Ct. 698
- 77 L. Ed. 1321
- 1933 U.S. LEXIS 191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that it is prejudicial error for the trial court to comment unfavorably on a witness
- stating that it is prejudicial error for the trial court to comment unfavorably on a witness
- stating that judges must be careful in instructions to limit comments on evidence so as not to sway or mislead jury
- stating that judges must be careful in instructions to limit comments on evidence so as not to sway or mislead jury
- holding that an instruction to the jury that the judge's opinion of the evidence was not binding on them was not sufficient to cure the prejudice caused by the judge's statement that people who wipe their hands while testifying are liars
- holding that an instruction to the jury that the judge’s opinion of the evidence was not binding on them was not sufficient to cure the prejudice caused by the judge’s statement that people who wipe their hands while testifying are liars
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hughes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.