United States v. Vigeant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the government failed to show objective good faith and that excluding evidence would have a substantial deterrent effect on the police because the affidavit made material omissions and included false and misleading statements
• “The warrant authorized the agents to look for all ‘original bank records or copies’ of Vi-geant’s business and personal accounts at Fleet Bank.”
• expressly limiting inquiry to “whether there was probable cause to believe that Vigeant had committed the crime of laundering drug proceeds, ... as alleged in the affidavit [for the search warrant application]”
• \another weap on located behind a downstairs liquor cabi'net\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).