United States v. Alfred Martin Baxter, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the affidavit was a `bare bones' affidavit because \the officer involved... had to realize that the source of the information against the defendant was an unknown party who was unavailable and could not be demonstrated to be reliable\
• stating that the affidavit was a ‘bare bones’ affidavit because “the officer involved ... had to realize that the source of the information against the defendant was an unknown party who was unavailable and could not be demonstrated to be reliable”
• barring application of the good-faith exception where affiant implied that CI was credible and reliable when affiant had no basis for the implication
• refusing to apply good faith exception to \bare bones\ affidavit in which officer misrepresented \anonymous\ informant as \confiden- tial\ informant
• refusing to apply the good faith excep- tion where \the officer involved . . . had to realize that the source of the information against defendant was an unknown party who was unavailable and could not be demonstrated to be`reliable'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).