· 10/19/2006
Vigeant v. United States
Citations
- 462 F. Supp. 2d 221
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79488
- 2006 WL 3069622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that because plaintiff was “charged with the crime for which he was arrested” there was no difference between the analysis of probable cause for arrest and probable cause to press charges
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William E. Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.