Skip to main content
· 1/9/2002

United States v. Diehl

Citations

  • 276 F.3d 32
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 283
  • 2002 WL 13039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where the government, as here, invokes the good faith exception to the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule, it bears the burden of showing that the officers acted in good faith
  • explaining that when the State seeks to introduce evidence based on a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule, the State carries the burden to demonstrate that the conduct at issue meets the standards of good faith
  • “Dunn’s requirement that a resident make efforts to avoid ‘observation by people passing by,’ . . 12 . surely does not require efforts to insure total insulation at all times.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Coffin, Saris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.