Eleventh Circuit· 9/4/1998

United States v. Veal

Citations

153 F.3d 1233
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 38861
1998 WL 564374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Garrity does not prohibit a subsequent perjury or obstruction of justice charge if a witness makes a false statement
noting that Garrity immunity “is Supreme Court-created and self-executing; it arises by operation of law; no authority or statute needs to grant it”
misleading conduct statute encompasses “a wide range of conduct that thwarts justice,” including “us[ing] unwitting third parties” to conceal the truth
providing that § 1512 “does not depend on the existence or imminency of a federal case or investigation but rather on the possible existence of a federal crime and a defendant’s intention to thwart an inquiry into that crime”
distinguishing a subsection (A) offense from a subsection (C) offense on the basis of the defendant’s intent
referring to “3 percent of the first $1,000 collected and 1 1/2 percent on the excess of any sum over $1,000” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Birch, Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Veal

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.