United States v. Gold Star Medical Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court will look at legislative intent when the plain meaning is ambiguous
• explaining that a court will look at legislative intent when the plain meaning is ambiguous
• explaining that a court will look at legislative intent when the plain meaning is ambiguous
• interpreting 18 U.S.C. § 1345(a)(2) and finding the plain language of the statute 6 ambiguous
• finding term “restraining order” as used in federal statute to be ambiguous where definition supplied by Black’s Law Dictionary conflicted with meaning applied in other contexts
• rejecting a reading of a contractual provision that would lead to absurd results

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).