LaChance v. Erickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was irrelevant that statements were not made under oath for the purpose of criminal culpability for making false statements to government agency investigators
• holding that it was irrelevant that statements were not made under oath for the purpose of criminal culpability for making false statements to government agency investigators
• holding that it was irrelevant that statements were not made under oath for the purpose of criminal culpability for making false statements to government agency investigators
• stating that an agency “may well . . . Case: 19-1973 Document: 46 Page: 12 Filed: 02/08/2021 12 HOLMES v. USPS take into consideration” its employee’s invocation of his or her Fifth Amendment right
• “It is well established that a criminal defendant’s right to testify does not include the right to commit perjury.”
• “The core of due process is the right to notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).