United States v. US Infrastructure, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Indeed, the words they claim the court should have used are virtually identical to the words the court actually used.”
• Eleventh Circuit: whether grand jury was “used solely or even primarily” for improper purpose
• “Rule 404(b) does not specifically apply to exclude . . . evidence [which] involves an USCA11 Case: 19-13926 Date Filed: 09/06/2022 Page: 72 of 104 72 Opinion of the Court 19-13926 extraneous offense committed by someone other than the defend- ant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).