United States v. Freddie Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of 31 uncharged tax refund checks as intrinsic to the charged crimes
• holding that the use of a name and forged signature qualifies as a “means of identification” under § 1028A
• holding that the defendant did not preserve a claim of error for appeal when he objected to the admission of evidence before trial, the district court only issued a provisional ruling, and the defendant did not renew the objection at trial
• explaining that one can be convicted under § 641 for depositing refunds from falsely filed tax returns
• finding a provisional ruling did not relieve counsel of the obligation to make a contemporaneous objection
• stating, on plain error review, that the defendant “fails to show a variance occurred that substantially prejudiced his rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).