United States v. Meier Jason Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that this Court lacked jurisdiction to review a magistrate judge’s order quashing a subpoena because that ruling was not appealed to the district court and explaining that Rule 59(a
• concluding in an appeal from a final criminal judgment that this Court lacked jurisdiction to review a magistrate judge's non-dispositive order because the appellant “never appealed the ruling to the district court”
• avoiding the question whether the right to confrontation exists at federal capital sentencing because there was no violation of the right
• noting a party cannot claim his own statement should be excluded under the Confrontation Clause
• “The Crawford rule applies only to testimonial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).