United States v. Torres-Ramirez, Dan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Payment before delivery differs from delivery before payment, the ‘fronting’ transaction from which an inference of agreement may be drawn.” (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted)
• “Payment before delivery differs from delivery before payment, the ‘fronting’ transaction from which an inference of agreement may be drawn.” (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted)
• “Payment before delivery differs from delivery before payment, the ‘fronting’ transaction from which an inference of agreement may be drawn.” (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted)
• “When the sentence rests on testimony under oath, however, it is enough that the judge believe the witness—unless the testimony is illogical or contradicted by documents or other physical evidence, making it clearly erroneous to accept the witness’s ver- sion of events.”
• “The lead opin- ion, which was joined by three judges, Judge Rovner’s concurring opinion, id. at 357, and the dissenting opinion, id. at 357–64, also joined by three judges, agreed on this point. The lead opinion therefore establishes the holding of the case.”
• “The lead opin- ion, which was joined by three judges, Judge Rovner’s concurring opinion, id. at 357, and the dissenting opinion, id. at 357–64, also joined by three judges, agreed on this point. The lead opinion therefore establishes the holding of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).