United States v. Patrick Menting and Dennis Tushoski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an alternative interpretation of the evidence “at the very most ... suggests] that another rational jury might have” decided the case differently
• noting that an alternative interpretation of the evidence “at the very most . . . suggest[s] that another rational jury might have” decided the case differently
• additional information set forth in pre-sentence report cannot be considered in weighing sufficiency of evidence underlying defendant’s conviction
• additional information set forth in pre-sentence report cannot be considered in weighing sufficiency of evidence underlying defendant’s conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).