United States v. Alexander Durrive

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \We reiterate the requirement that counsel provide this court with the district court's specific findings of fact relevant to sentencing . . .\
• evidence that defendant participated in several phone calls was sufficient to show link
• circumstantial evidence may be sole support for a conspiracy conviction
• circumstantial evidence may be sole support for a conspiracy conviction
• conspiracy requires more than mere knowledge or approval of illegal scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).