Sixth Circuit· 5/27/2010
United States v. Al-Cholan
Citations
- 610 F.3d 945
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10820
- 2010 WL 2130612
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a police report helped corroborate hearsay testimony and both supported the district court’s “imposition of a sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(b) on the basis of ‘a pattern of activity involving prohibited sexual conduct’”
- “[C]orroborating evidence can provide [hearsay] statements with a sufficient indicia of reliability.”
- “This court reviews a trial court’s legal conclusions on Miranda waivers de novo, and findings of fact underlying those conclusions for clear error.”
- “[Defendant’s] entrapment- defense fails because the evidence incontrovertibly establishes that he was predisposed to commit the offense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Guy, Boggs, Sutton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Patrick WandahsegaSixth Circuit· 2019-05-21· cited 399×
- United States v. BroxmeyerSecond Circuit· 2012-08-28· cited 389×
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-01· cited 375×
- United States v. Daryl LawrenceSixth Circuit· 2013-10-22· cited 102×
- United States v. Alvin RaySixth Circuit· 2015-09-23· cited 89×
- United States v. McCartySixth Circuit· 2010-12-28· cited 70×
- United States v. Kenneth KennedySixth Circuit· 2013-05-10· cited 62×
- United States v. Wassim MazloumSixth Circuit· 2012-08-23· cited 53×
- United States v. Kelvin CrumptonSixth Circuit· 2016-06-02· cited 51×
- United States v. DemmlerSixth Circuit· 2011-08-23· cited 40×
- United States v. Richard CrawfordSixth Circuit· 2019-11-18· cited 38×
- United States v. Prabhu RamamoorthySixth Circuit· 2020-02-07· cited 26×
- United States v. Darius McKeeverD.C. Circuit· 2016-06-10· cited 18×
- United States v. Mohanad HammadiSixth Circuit· 2013-12-17· cited 9×
- United States v. Narsan LingalaThird Circuit· 2024-01-30· cited 7×
- United States v. Jonathan BarrettSixth Circuit· 2021-05-26
- United States v. RobersonDistrict of Columbia· 2021-11-15
- United States v. PinedaM.D. Tennessee· 2014-02-13
- United States v. Barry Croft, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 2025-04-01
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 7,739×
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-19· cited 1,793×
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 1,587×
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 1,244×
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,070×
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 910×
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 856×
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-04-06· cited 691×
- United States v. Gordon PennellSixth Circuit· 1984-07-31· cited 313×
- United States v. Norman ArcherSecond Circuit· 1973-09-26· cited 262×
- United States v. ShermanSecond Circuit· 1952-12-16· cited 234×
- United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-CotaSixth Circuit· 1984-12-20· cited 194×
- United States v. Rafael Santana and Francis FuentesFirst Circuit· 1993-09-16· cited 189×
- United States v. BrandSecond Circuit· 2006-10-19· cited 183×
- United States v. Timothy ChambersSixth Circuit· 2006-03-23· cited 137×
- United States v. Scott A. FergusonSixth Circuit· 2006-08-09· cited 137×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.