· 7/13/2009
United States v. Struzik
Citations
- 572 F.3d 484
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15376
- 2009 WL 2004017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district courts are not required to “specifically respond to every argument made by the defendant”
- sentence within Guidelines range is accorded appellate presumption of reasonableness; listing circumstances where court abuses its discretion, resulting in substantively unreasonable sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Colloton, Gibson, Beam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.