Skip to main content
· 7/13/2009

United States v. Struzik

Citations

  • 572 F.3d 484
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15376
  • 2009 WL 2004017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district courts are not required to “specifically respond to every argument made by the defendant”
  • sentence within Guidelines range is accorded appellate presumption of reasonableness; listing circumstances where court abuses its discretion, resulting in substantively unreasonable sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colloton, Gibson, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.