United States v. Jamie Ballard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, because appellant failed to provide any specific argument about cumulative error, the argument could be “summarily rejected”
• finding no purposeful or negligent delay when the State gave fingerprint report to defense counsel a week before trial
• “As to the prosecutorial misconduct issues, Appellate counsel raised three issues in that regard: (1) improperly appealing to the jury’s passions and prejudices; (2) misstating the reasonable doubt standard; and (3) using Thumm’s pre-Miranda silence to imply Thumm’s guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).