Skip to main content
· 5/8/2012

United States v. Stefanidakis

Citations

  • 678 F.3d 96
  • 2012 WL 1588965
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding forfeited appellant's double jeopardy claim and applying plain error review
  • in reviewing a double jeopardy challenge, courts must see if the record \contains facts sufficient to supply a rational basis for a finding that [the prosecutions] were predicated on different conduct.\ (citations omitted)
  • in reviewing a double jeopardy challenge, courts must see if the record \contains facts sufficient to supply a rational basis for a finding that [the prosecutions] were predicated on different conduct.\ (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Selya, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.