· 5/8/2012
United States v. Stefanidakis
Citations
- 678 F.3d 96
- 2012 WL 1588965
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9336
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding forfeited appellant's double jeopardy claim and applying plain error review
- in reviewing a double jeopardy challenge, courts must see if the record \contains facts sufficient to supply a rational basis for a finding that [the prosecutions] were predicated on different conduct.\ (citations omitted)
- in reviewing a double jeopardy challenge, courts must see if the record \contains facts sufficient to supply a rational basis for a finding that [the prosecutions] were predicated on different conduct.\ (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Selya, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.