Third Circuit· 8/19/1997
United States v. Smith
Citations
- 123 F.3d 140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that grand jury secrecy ensures that “persons who are accused but exonerated by the grand jury will not be held up to public ridicule” (quoting Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 211, 219 (1979)
- making grand jury proceedings public could result in flight of those about to be indicted and expose the \accused but exonerated . . . to public ridicule\
- “ ‘The plain language of ... Rule [6(e)] shows that Congress intended for its confidentiality provisions to cover matters beyond those actually occurring before the grand jury.’ ”
- newspapers requested access to sealed materials in a criminal case regarding a state-lottery kickback scheme
- newspapers requested access to sealed materials in a criminal case regarding a state-lottery kickback scheme
- “Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) is intended to preserve the tradition of grand jury secrecy, creating a general rule of confidentiality for all ‘matters occurring before the grand jury.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Motions of Dow Jones & Co.D.C. Circuit· 1998-05-05· cited 106×
- United States v. ConnollyFirst Circuit· 2003-02-26· cited 64×
- In Re Special Grand Jury 89-2Tenth Circuit· 2006-06-15· cited 63×
- United States v. WechtThird Circuit· 2008-08-01· cited 42×
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaFirst Circuit· 2011-11-01· cited 40×
- In Re Special ProceedingsFirst Circuit· 2004-06-21· cited 31×
- Douglas Smith v. United States District Court OfficersSeventh Circuit· 2000-02-07· cited 30×
- United States v. Index Newspapers LLCNinth Circuit· 2014-09-05· cited 23×
- Newark Morning Ledger Co., Publisher of the Star-LedgerThird Circuit· 2001-07-18· cited 18×
- Andrea Constand v. William Cosby, Jr.Third Circuit· 2016-08-15· cited 18×
- United States v. McDougalEighth Circuit· 2009-03-20· cited 17×
- Alvarez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-08-27· cited 10×
- In re Motions Seeking Access to 2019 StatementsD. Delaware· 2018-03-27· cited 10×
- Public Interest Legal v. NC State Board of ElectionsFourth Circuit· 2021-05-10· cited 9×
- United States v. HsiaDistrict of Columbia· 2000-01-04· cited 8×
- Los Angeles Times v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-12-12· cited 7×
- Barber v. SHOP-RITE OF ENGLEWOOD & ASSOCIATES, INC.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-05-30· cited 7×
- Smith v. United StatesD. Delaware· 2000-03-31· cited 5×
- United States v. Town of Moreau, NYN.D. New York· 1997-09-25· cited 4×
- In Re Motion for Release of Court RecordsForeign Intelligence Surveillance Court· 2007-12-11· cited 3×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 4,546×
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,854×
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1980-07-02· cited 1,951×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 1,758×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,326×
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 982×
- United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-30· cited 517×
- Levine v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-05-23· cited 408×
- In Re Ford Motor CompanyThird Circuit· 1997-05-02· cited 283×
- Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. District Court in & for Oklahoma CountySupreme Court· 1977-03-07· cited 262×
- Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., Richard I. Burstein, Proposed IntervenorThird Circuit· 1993-06-25· cited 246×
- United States v. CridenThird Circuit· 1981-04-20· cited 246×
- Littlejohn v. BIC Corp.Third Circuit· 1988-07-06· cited 200×
- United States v. Howard L. Criden, Harry P. Jannotti, Louis C. Johanson, George X. Schwartz. Appeal of Philadelphia Newspapers, IncThird Circuit· 1982-03-26· cited 155×
- United States v. Michael J. Corbitt, Pulitzer Community Newspapers, Inc., Intervenor-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1989-06-19· cited 136×
- United States v. AntarThird Circuit· 1994-10-25· cited 115×
- In Re Capital Cities/abc, Inc.'s Application for Access to Sealed Transcripts. Appeal of Capital Cities/abc, IncThird Circuit· 1990-08-23· cited 112×
- United States v. Charmer Industries, Inc., and Peerless Importers, Inc.Second Circuit· 1983-06-28· cited 110×
- In Re Grand Jury Matter. Appeal of Nicholas CataniaThird Circuit· 1982-06-02· cited 86×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.