Skip to main content
· 3/20/2009

United States v. McDougal

Citations

  • 559 F.3d 837
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5815
  • 2009 WL 723265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[C]ourts will not order disclosure absent a recognized exception to Rule 6(e) or a valid challenge to the original sealing order or its implementation.\
  • “[C]ourts will not order dis- closure absent a recognized exception to Rule 6(e) or a valid 32 No. 15-2972 challenge to the original sealing order or its implementa- tion.”
  • “‘Because the grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside,’ . . . courts will not order disclosure absent a 12 Case: 17-15016 Date Filed: 03/27/2020 Page: 13 of 104 recognized exception to Rule 6(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Limbaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.