Brace v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant is precluded from bringing his Ncmíos-based statutory interpretation argument under Prost
• stating that petition under § 2241 attacks the execution of a sentence rather than its validity
• stating that petition under § 2241 attacks the execution of a sentence rather than its validity
• noting that “[a] petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 typically ‘attacks the execution of a sentence . . . and must be filed in the district where the prisoner is confined”
• noting § 2241 claims must generally “be filed in the district where the prisoner is confined”
• observing that Prost foreclosed petitioner’s argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).