Tenth Circuit· 3/4/2008

United States v. Smart

Citations

518 F.3d 800
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4635
2008 WL 570804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding appellate courts must grant deference “not only to a district court’s factual findings but also to its determinations of the weight to be afforded to such findings.”
holding appellate courts must grant deference \not only to a district court's factual findings but also to its determinations of the weight to be afforded to such findings.\
stating that we cannot examine the weight that a district court assigns to statutory sentencing factors
holding this court must give substantial deference to the district court’s weighing of the § 3553(a) factors
noting that “a substantive component” of the requisite reasonableness review of sentences “relates to the length of the resulting sentence”
describing how differences in culpability may offset differences in acceptance of responsibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Lucero, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Smart

20 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.