Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 2/23/2005

Johnson v. California

Citations

  • 543 U.S. 499
  • 125 S. Ct. 1141
  • 160 L. Ed. 2d 949
  • 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “all racial classification” imposed by government “must be analyzed by a reviewing court under strict scrutiny”
  • holding that an “unwritten [prison] policy of racially segregating prisoners in double cells” was subject to strict scrutiny
  • holding that Turner did not “cast doubt on” the Court’s previous holding that strict scrutiny applies to racial classifications in prisons
  • holding that the State had burden to show that race-based classifications satisfied strict scrutiny analysis
  • holding that strict scrutiny is the appropriate standard of review for racial classifications even in the prison context
  • holding that strict scrutiny is the proper standard of review for a prisoner’s equal protection challenge to racial classifications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Stevens, Thomas, Scalia, Rehnquist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

261 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.